<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Notifying users about third-party add-ons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/08/Notifying-users-about-third-party-add-ons/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/08/Notifying-users-about-third-party-add-ons</link>
	<description>Spouting nonsense from the depths of my spare time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:20:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oxymoronical &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Progress on notifying users about third-party add-ons</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/08/Notifying-users-about-third-party-add-ons#comment-30653</link>
		<dc:creator>Oxymoronical &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Progress on notifying users about third-party add-ons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronical.com/?p=605#comment-30653</guid>
		<description>[...] add-ons that third-party installers have added to Firefox. You can read more about it in last weeks blog post or on the project [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] add-ons that third-party installers have added to Firefox. You can read more about it in last weeks blog post or on the project [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jigar shah</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/08/Notifying-users-about-third-party-add-ons#comment-30287</link>
		<dc:creator>Jigar shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 06:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronical.com/?p=605#comment-30287</guid>
		<description>Yes..I am troubled with one extension mugshot that comes default with Fedora. Its painful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes..I am troubled with one extension mugshot that comes default with Fedora. Its painful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oh, now I remember a reason why I hate M&#8230; &#171; Nightgunner5 is a Geek</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/08/Notifying-users-about-third-party-add-ons#comment-30264</link>
		<dc:creator>Oh, now I remember a reason why I hate M&#8230; &#171; Nightgunner5 is a Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronical.com/?p=605#comment-30264</guid>
		<description>[...] Oh, now I remember a reason why I hate Micro$oft   &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oh, now I remember a reason why I hate Micro$oft   &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kaply</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/08/Notifying-users-about-third-party-add-ons#comment-30260</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kaply</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronical.com/?p=605#comment-30260</guid>
		<description>Actually Brand Thunder has started shipping some extensions as EXEs.

It allows distribution on sites that don&#039;t accept XPIs.

For example:

http://www.softpedia.com/progDownload/Indianapolis-Colts-Boom-Download-135626.html

Basically they are investigating distribution mechanisms other than AMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Brand Thunder has started shipping some extensions as EXEs.</p>
<p>It allows distribution on sites that don&#8217;t accept XPIs.</p>
<p>For example:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.softpedia.com/progDownload/Indianapolis-Colts-Boom-Download-135626.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.softpedia.com/progDownload/Indianapolis-Colts-Boom-Download-135626.html</a></p>
<p>Basically they are investigating distribution mechanisms other than AMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mossop</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/08/Notifying-users-about-third-party-add-ons#comment-30259</link>
		<dc:creator>Mossop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronical.com/?p=605#comment-30259</guid>
		<description>Fundamentally right now Firefox can&#039;t really tell whether an external extension was installed as part of another application or standalone, so the UI we add here will apply to both. I have to be honest though, I&#039;ve not come across standalone extensions shipped as an exe, can you name some examples?

Really I don&#039;t want to think of this new UI as a warning. The vast majority of cases where system extensions appear are legitimate, we&#039;re just allowing users to control whether they ever run without significantly delaying startup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fundamentally right now Firefox can&#8217;t really tell whether an external extension was installed as part of another application or standalone, so the UI we add here will apply to both. I have to be honest though, I&#8217;ve not come across standalone extensions shipped as an exe, can you name some examples?</p>
<p>Really I don&#8217;t want to think of this new UI as a warning. The vast majority of cases where system extensions appear are legitimate, we&#8217;re just allowing users to control whether they ever run without significantly delaying startup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kaply</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/08/Notifying-users-about-third-party-add-ons#comment-30256</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kaply</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronical.com/?p=605#comment-30256</guid>
		<description>What if an extension is actually distributed standalone as an EXE and installed that way?

Will Firefox still warn about it?

Even though it was designed to be installed this way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if an extension is actually distributed standalone as an EXE and installed that way?</p>
<p>Will Firefox still warn about it?</p>
<p>Even though it was designed to be installed this way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
