<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightweight themes UI landed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/09/Lightweight-themes-UI-landed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/09/Lightweight-themes-UI-landed</link>
	<description>Spouting nonsense from the depths of my spare time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:20:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Upcoming Web Browser: Mozilla Firefox 3.6</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/09/Lightweight-themes-UI-landed#comment-32369</link>
		<dc:creator>Upcoming Web Browser: Mozilla Firefox 3.6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronical.com/?p=666#comment-32369</guid>
		<description>[...] shortcut (currently you must turn it on with the browser.ctrlTab.previews config option), and lightweight themes that don&#8217;t require a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shortcut (currently you must turn it on with the browser.ctrlTab.previews config option), and lightweight themes that don&#8217;t require a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mossop</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/09/Lightweight-themes-UI-landed#comment-31859</link>
		<dc:creator>Mossop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 07:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronical.com/?p=666#comment-31859</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure the larger preview is a good idea since it is simply too wide for the preview area and would cause scrollbars to appear. I think it is better to see a small overview than just a part of the whole when glancing through. This is something we can easily tinker with though, even after Firefox is released, we&#039;ll see what further comments come back in the next few weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure the larger preview is a good idea since it is simply too wide for the preview area and would cause scrollbars to appear. I think it is better to see a small overview than just a part of the whole when glancing through. This is something we can easily tinker with though, even after Firefox is released, we&#8217;ll see what further comments come back in the next few weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mossop</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/09/Lightweight-themes-UI-landed#comment-31858</link>
		<dc:creator>Mossop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 07:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronical.com/?p=666#comment-31858</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so sure there needs to be, as it is right now we&#039;re showing them as a straight alternative to other themes. Do users need to know what is going on under the hood or just that all of these things change how Firefox looks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure there needs to be, as it is right now we&#8217;re showing them as a straight alternative to other themes. Do users need to know what is going on under the hood or just that all of these things change how Firefox looks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mossop</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/09/Lightweight-themes-UI-landed#comment-31857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mossop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 07:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronical.com/?p=666#comment-31857</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve been using Lightweight Themes internally to refer to the feature in Firefox, this is as opposed to Personas which is the extension which we expect to continue to live and try out new ideas outside of Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been using Lightweight Themes internally to refer to the feature in Firefox, this is as opposed to Personas which is the extension which we expect to continue to live and try out new ideas outside of Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mossop</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/09/Lightweight-themes-UI-landed#comment-31856</link>
		<dc:creator>Mossop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 07:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronical.com/?p=666#comment-31856</guid>
		<description>The actual process of previewing and using a new lightweight theme will be pretty much exactly as it is with the personas extension when viewing a gallery on the website. The UI in the add-ons manager is just the one used to view previously used lightweight themes, they apply instantly too as long as you don&#039;t have a third-party theme applied.

As for forcing default icons, it is simply a case of getting something solid and usable into Firefox 3.6. Had we gone down a more complex path we wouldn&#039;t have made the deadlines I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The actual process of previewing and using a new lightweight theme will be pretty much exactly as it is with the personas extension when viewing a gallery on the website. The UI in the add-ons manager is just the one used to view previously used lightweight themes, they apply instantly too as long as you don&#8217;t have a third-party theme applied.</p>
<p>As for forcing default icons, it is simply a case of getting something solid and usable into Firefox 3.6. Had we gone down a more complex path we wouldn&#8217;t have made the deadlines I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mossop</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/09/Lightweight-themes-UI-landed#comment-31855</link>
		<dc:creator>Mossop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 07:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronical.com/?p=666#comment-31855</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s certainly something we are thinking about for the future though I think the UI needs more thought than that to make it clear to users what is going on. What we wanted to do was get a base level of functionality uplifted into Firefox and then have the Personas extension experiment with further ideas that can then be rolled into future Firefox releases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s certainly something we are thinking about for the future though I think the UI needs more thought than that to make it clear to users what is going on. What we wanted to do was get a base level of functionality uplifted into Firefox and then have the Personas extension experiment with further ideas that can then be rolled into future Firefox releases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/09/Lightweight-themes-UI-landed#comment-31854</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 07:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronical.com/?p=666#comment-31854</guid>
		<description>One of the advantages of Personas is that it is very easy to try out different themes, or to switch themes.  Just hover over a choice in the menu to pre-view.  This looks the same as the normal theme UI, i.e. very cumbersome to use compared to Personas.

Also, I agree with Frederic.  I use a theme that changes the icons only (I dislike to the default icons, but prefer simplicity &amp; native looks).  Why force the default icons on anyone who would use these &#039;lightweight&#039; themes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the advantages of Personas is that it is very easy to try out different themes, or to switch themes.  Just hover over a choice in the menu to pre-view.  This looks the same as the normal theme UI, i.e. very cumbersome to use compared to Personas.</p>
<p>Also, I agree with Frederic.  I use a theme that changes the icons only (I dislike to the default icons, but prefer simplicity &amp; native looks).  Why force the default icons on anyone who would use these &#8216;lightweight&#8217; themes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: level</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/09/Lightweight-themes-UI-landed#comment-31848</link>
		<dc:creator>level</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 01:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronical.com/?p=666#comment-31848</guid>
		<description>BTW, is &quot;lightweight themes&quot; the official name? I prefer Personas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, is &#8220;lightweight themes&#8221; the official name? I prefer Personas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: level</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/09/Lightweight-themes-UI-landed#comment-31847</link>
		<dc:creator>level</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 01:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronical.com/?p=666#comment-31847</guid>
		<description>I think the thumbnail is too small. Why don&#039;t you use bigger one shown in individual persona page ( http://www.getpersonas.com/persona/34365 )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the thumbnail is too small. Why don&#8217;t you use bigger one shown in individual persona page ( <a href="http://www.getpersonas.com/persona/34365" rel="nofollow">http://www.getpersonas.com/persona/34365</a> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederic</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2009/09/Lightweight-themes-UI-landed#comment-31841</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronical.com/?p=666#comment-31841</guid>
		<description>Seperating personas into a catogory separate from addons and themes could allow for personas-enabled themes. That way people could change themes but still have their favorite background. Themes would of course have personas disabled by default unless they have a property in install.rdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seperating personas into a catogory separate from addons and themes could allow for personas-enabled themes. That way people could change themes but still have their favorite background. Themes would of course have personas disabled by default unless they have a property in install.rdf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
