<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>adverts on Oxymoronical</title>
    <link>https://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/tag/adverts/</link>
    <description>Recent content in adverts on Oxymoronical</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:09:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/tag/adverts/feed/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Should AMO allow adverts for pay-for add-ons?</title>
      <link>https://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2008/06/Should-AMO-allow-adverts-for-pay-for-add-ons/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2008/06/Should-AMO-allow-adverts-for-pay-for-add-ons/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Assuming you agree that paying for some add-ons is ok then you have to ask what we do about people using AMO as a marketing platform. This is a tough question since we risk devaluing AMO as a website if it just gets filled up with adverts. I don’t believe that there is an official policy on this. It is such a rare issue right now that maybe one isn’t necessary, but here are are my thoughts on what such a policy might say.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
